On 02/18/2014 11:08 PM, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55:32PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> On 02/18/2014 10:15 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > [...] >>> If we have working OpenRC on kFreeBSD and GNU Hurd, can I do: >>> >>> Depends: systemd | openrc >>> >>> if I want to get rid of non-declarative init scripts in my daemon >>> packages? > [...] >> Once I consider OpenRC ready for it, would it be ok to just replace >> sysv-rc by OpenRC, and transform sysv-rc into a transitional package? >> What is the opinion of other DDs? Is there anyone which would like to >> keep the old featureless sysv-rc? > > My opinion is that maintainers should still provide sysv init scripts until it > is decided that Debian does not support sysvinit any more. The TC decided that > systemd will be the default init system on Linux, not that it would be the > only > init system. > > Dropping support for sysv init scripts now means that you are burning the > bridge before you finished crossing it.
You are IMO missing the point. I'm not proposing to drop support for init scripts, but remove sysv-rc. That's very different! We could continue to have init scripts but have OpenRC to use them. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5303831c.4020...@debian.org
