On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 18:10 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2016-01-03 17:03:02, Simon McVittie wrote: > > […] For > > instance, /bin -> /usr/bin is needed because otherwise #!/bin/sh would > > stop working, […] > > This brings to mind—I wonder if the performance impact of having /bin/sh > be read through two indirections (/bin/sh → /usr/bin/sh → > /usr/bin/{dash, bash, etc.}) is non-zero and if it could be reliably > measured.
Trivial compared to the cost of running a single line of a shell script. Ben. > This is not an argument against UsrMerge, I'm very much for it; I'm just > curious. > > iustin -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part