On 9/10/19 3:26 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: > I tried to cover the disadvantages of this in the original mail: > > * Works poorly when maintainership changes Why? Its git. Press the fork button, select a destination, update debian/control, be happy. > * Works poorly when account status changes Why? Do we delete repositories? > There are a number of ways forward: > >[...] > 5) Make no recommendations in this space Why do all things need a recommendation? List the possible places to host a repository with their advantages/disadvantages. If somebody is not able to decide where to put a package based on that, they might not be able to maintain it anyway. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa David Bremner
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to ... Sam Hartman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Russ Allbery
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Jonas Smedegaard
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... David Bremner
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Enrico Zini
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Sam Hartman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Sam Hartman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Bernd Zeimetz
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Matt Zagrabelny
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Ansgar
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When... Jonas Meurer
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa Ian Jackson
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa David Bremner
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa Sam Hartman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa David Bremner
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa Ansgar
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa Sam Hartman
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa David Bremner