On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:18:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but
> I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of
> peer review system for new packages that is less formal and less
> bottlenecked on a single team than the current NEW processing setup.
What do you think, would it be more or less staffed than the current RFS
review process?

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to