On Tue, Feb 01 2022, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but > I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of > peer review system for new packages that is less formal and less > bottlenecked on a single team than the current NEW processing setup. This is a fantastic idea. In fact, it wouldn't have to bottleneck packages at all. I mean, if a quality issue is found in NEW, wouldn't the same be an RC bug preventing a transition to testing? - John