Is it possible to show a table with positive and negative aspects
of administration tools?
lwat
CipUX
GOsa

Thanks,
Sergio
Brazil
2010/10/21 Andreas B. Mundt <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> once again a mail about the LDAP administration tool we need in
> Debian-Edu. Since Petter's mail
> <URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2010/09/msg00110.html>
> almost a month passed:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Here is a short update on the LDAP admin status for Debian Edu based
> > on Squeeze.
>
> The only changes I know of concern GOsa and the latest package in
> squeeze which fixes the password exposure issue; now you need to
> be either root or www-data to see the environment in the process
> list. Changes to debian-edu-config are minimal, I will apply them as
> soon as 2.6.11-2 enters squeeze, which should happen in approximately
> a week from now. The mass creation of users works in my tests too.
>
> Please add information about progress on the other tools mentioned.
>
> My question is:
>
> What is the plan? Almost since the beginning of this year we decide
> *not* to decide anything at all concerning LDAP administration. I
> think this is fine for some time, to see how things evolve.
>
> But at some point it just takes away motivation and leads to a passive
> waiting for the things to come. Nobody wants to spend his time on
> things that are rejected in the end.
>
> How long do we want to continue waiting and for what? For another
> alternative tool turning up at the horizon that promises everything?
> Squeeze+1? Miracles? Or do we prefer to have 2 half-baked
> administration tools, one for users and groups, one for machines and
> netgroups, a couple of scripts to add users and ldapvi for all
> remaining stuff?
>
> In my opinion it is better to accept that there is no perfect tool
> available at the moment (and perhaps forever), and to decide _now_
> which administration tool we want to ship for squeeze. After that
> decision, it makes sense to complete the integration. There should be
> time left to test and look into remaining issues and fixes, to
> document and prepare the manual.
>
> So let's name things by their names:
>
> As Petter already listed, we have 3 candidates: CipUX, GOsa and
> lwat. (Or is there already another one approaching?)
>
> Which tool do we ship for squeeze? (And keep in mind: not deciding is
> also a decision, but I doubt it's the best one for
> Debian-Edu/skolelinux a couple (?) of months before squeeze release).
>
> Regards,
>
>        Andi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [email protected]
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101021151712.ga29...@flashgordon
>
>

Reply via email to