Le Saturday 23 October 2010 13:07:27 Jonas Smedegaard, vous avez écrit : > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 06:08:01PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >[Sérgio Saraiva] > > > >> Is it possible to show a table with positive and negative aspects of > >> administration tools? > >> > >| lwat | broken in edu/squeeze | used to do what we wanted | > >| > >| | missing people | | > >| > >| cipux | missing in edu/squeeze | unknown if it fits us | > >| > >| | missing people | | > >| > >| gosa | missing some features | partly working in edu/squeeze | > >| > >| | | got people | > > It should not be "unknown" that CipUX is in production use on > Skolelinux-based systems in Rheinland-Pfalz.
Hello, > It should be trivial to include CipUX, as it is already officially in > Debian. > > So apparently people is the main reason for favoring GoSA over CipUX. > > ...and with "people" I mean "people specifically devoted to > Skolelinux". The idea behind using GOsa² is that the software is mature, supported and have people willing to help debian Edu to use it :) > Andreas Mundt has been _very_ active on GoSA (and thanks for that!) but > now starts as a teacher and do not expect himself to be able to > continue contributing at same pace. > > Who else in Skolelinux besides Andreas is actively working on GoSA? i offered my help, and already started at looking at and ldap tree from debian-edu to see how it fit onto GOsa² and what is missing. Cheers -- Benoit Mortier CEO OpenSides "logiciels libres pour entreprises" : http://www.opensides.eu/ Promouvoir et défendre le Logiciel Libre http://www.april.org/ Contributor to Gosa Project : http://gosa-project.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
