So there is not dubt. Let's GOsa!
Thanks. Sérgio Saraiva Brazil 2010/10/21 Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> > [Sérgio Saraiva] > > Is it possible to show a table with positive and negative aspects of > > administration tools? > > | lwat | broken in edu/squeeze | used to do what we wanted | > | | missing people | | > | cipux | missing in edu/squeeze | unknown if it fits us | > | | missing people | | > | gosa | missing some features | partly working in edu/squeeze | > | | | got people | > > If someone got time and interest in making a better comparison, feel > free to add it to the wiki. But given that only one of the > alternatives (Gosa) have people interested in working on it and > getting it to work properly in edu/squeeze, I do not really see the > point. > > We have waited for lwat and cipux people for a long time, so it seem > unlikely that anyone will show up. And even if they did, it would be > hard to believe they were here for the long run, given the complete > lack of progress and interest for a long time. > > Happy hacking, > -- > Petter Reinholdtsen > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > >
