Le Friday 22 October 2010 16:38:13 Petter Reinholdtsen, vous avez écrit : > [Andreas B. Mundt]
Hello, [] > > Main difference to our current setup: Bind instead of powerDNS. > > Actually, we can continue to use powerDNS if we adjust GOsa to update > an extra attribute in the DNS tree. See > <URL:http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ldap.gosa/506> for the > details. i could look at it but we discussed about a global schema for bind and powerdns, is this done already ? > > I think the decision we have to take is: Do we want to continue > > using powerDNS (which means we cannot use the GOsa packages because > > they use bind, so we have to find a solution, hack something or > > whatever...) or can we switch to bind which should make most (if not > > all) of the tools we need available in the squeeze repositories. So > > if there are no grave arguments against bind I think that's the > > easier way to go. > > I believe we want to continue to use a DNS server that look up > information directly in LDAP, to ensure that DNS changes done in LDAP > take effect imediately. All the bind based solutions I have seen so > far uses regular exports from LDAP to files bind understands, causing > a delay until changes show up in DNS. Because of this, I believe we > are better off by keeping PowerDNS. And thus I believe a third option > - change GOsa to work with PowerDNS - is the best one. i understand your reason well i could take the actual dns plugin and look if we can change it to manage powerdns Cheers -- Benoit Mortier CEO OpenSides "logiciels libres pour entreprises" : http://www.opensides.eu/ Promouvoir et défendre le Logiciel Libre http://www.april.org/ Contributor to Gosa Project : http://gosa-project.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
