At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.3.1 > Severity: grave > > Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and > one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5).
Is this diff means as follows? - is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.2 (2003-03-07 crest unstable environment) + is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.3 (2003-03-07 crest testing environment) And are other libraries totally same version? Which version do you say? > Although I cannot prove that other build depedencies of binutils are > the cause of this failures, I start with glibc as the moist obvious > one ... So why do you file this bug as "grave"? Does binutils cause any problems? What do you want for us? Why don't you contact to binutils maintainer? The reason I request you more information is: building on m68k is too slow, so providing the information saves our limited time. Of course your report lacks much information. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]