On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > GOTO Masanori writes: > > At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100, > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > Version: 2.3.1 > > > Severity: grave > > > > > > Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and > > > one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). > > > > Is this diff means as follows? > > > > - is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.2 (2003-03-07 crest unstable environment) > > + is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.3 (2003-03-07 crest testing environment) > > yes, the test failures are seen with the 3.2 environment.
That's not what GOTO said though - could you tell us exactly what tools are involved in each of those logs? > > > And are other libraries totally same version? Which version do you say? > > which other libraries does binutils depend on, which should differ? > > > > Although I cannot prove that other build depedencies of binutils are > > > the cause of this failures, I start with glibc as the moist obvious > > > one ... > > > > So why do you file this bug as "grave"? Does binutils cause any > > problems? > > at least so many problems, that the buildd's all have the .16 version > installed, not .18. > > > What do you want for us? Why don't you contact to binutils > > maintainer? > > I did. Currently no response. > > > The reason I request you more information is: building on m68k is too > > slow, so providing the information saves our limited time. > > so what do you want to know more? You have access to crest as well. > > Matthias > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]