Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > However, Option 1 was the consensus of this list, and thus we've been > overridden[0]. I feel that we now need to figure out why the project as > a whole has rejected the draft position statement [2]
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 25a628e9-d88e-40x7-8e1c-888cff421ea5 [ ] Choice 1: pi = 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820 [ ] Choice 2: pi = 3.14 [ ] Choice 3: pi = 3 [needs legislature of Indiana approval] [ ] Choice 4: further discussion -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Attempts to legislate pi are always questionable, and when you ask a majority of uninformed voters[3] to choose between items, it's natural for the compromise to win, and not unheard of for it to end up "3". -- see shy jo [3] ie, people such as myself who might have appeared to read every message on every thread on this list, but IANAL and didn't have time/energy to follow each argument in depth
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature