Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe there are essentially two reconciliations we can have for each > problem listed in the position statement [2]: Either "that does not make > things non-free" or "that is not the intended reading of the license, > stop nit-picking so much."
Or that the GR changed the DFSG, and the proponents managed to browbeat the secretary into not requiring a 3:1 majority. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
