On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 23:35:18 +0200 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > On Mon Jul 8, 2024 at 11:39 PM CEST, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 15:50:59 +0200 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > thanks again Francesco!
You're welcome. :-) [...] > > the attached patch [...] > > fixes the mistake [...] > > applied and pushed. which brings me back to: > > > can I ask you to both let me know whether you're happy for me to > > > change the review status to completed? [...] Personally, I cannot see anything else that needs to be fixed in the [current] version of the technical note. I think it is 'adequately' fit for its purpose... ;-) [current]: <https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adequate/-/blob/f0454641633af27d1ad9663e12494eb6f9e9d3ca/license-incompatibility.md> I hope that the technical note, once finalized, gets included in package 'adequate', under the same license as the rest of package (Expat). Also, do you plan to automatically extract the incompatibility matrix from the technical note itself? That would prevent the matrix (as used by the "adequate" command) from ever becoming inconsistent with the documented matrix (as found in the technical note)... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpbqZt9GBDic.pgp
Description: PGP signature
