debian-legal
Thread
Date
Find
[
Earlier messages
]
[
Later messages
]
Messages by Thread
Re: GFDL and Debian Logo
Glenn Maynard
Re: GFDL and Debian Logo
Evan Prodromou
Re: GFDL and Debian Logo
Walter Landry
Re: GFDL and Debian Logo
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: GFDL and Debian Logo
Nathanael Nerode
Re: GFDL and Debian Logo
Hendrik Brummermann
Nathanael - your mail is broken [MAILER-DAEMON@zewt.org: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
Glenn Maynard
Re: Nathanael - your mail is broken [MAILER-DAEMON@zewt.org: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
Nathanael Nerode
Bits from debian-legal between 2004-09-06 and 2004-09-12
MJ Ray
Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-30 and 2004-09-05
MJ Ray
Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Roger Leigh
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
MJ Ray
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Roger Leigh
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Andrew Suffield
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Andrew Suffield
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Francesco Poli
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Joe Buck
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
MJ Ray
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Joe Buck
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Glenn Maynard
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Steve Langasek
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Josh Triplett
Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL
Francesco Poli
Hi, there is a discussion in the German Wikipedia whether the Debian Open Use Logo <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Debian_logo.png> may be subjected to the GFDL. The German Wikipedia does not accept any content not licensed as public domain or GFDL (e. g. no "fair use" because this is an American law only). > This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the > Debian project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project As far as I understand this sentence, the logo may not be used for other things and is not "free" according to the GFDL. The "possible copyright violation notice", however, was removed by the uploader today.
Hendrik Brummermann
OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Rene Engelhard
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Steve Langasek
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Rene Engelhard
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Chris Halls
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Josh Triplett
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Rene Engelhard
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Josh Triplett
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Steve Langasek
Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)
Baruch Even
IVBB-VIRENWARNUNG: WORM_NETSKY.P
warnung
All my apologise !
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Patent clauses in licenses
Michael Poole
Re: Patent clauses in licenses
MJ Ray
Re: Patent clauses in licenses
Nathanael Nerode
FIGlet: how to file an appropriate bug report?
Francesco Poli
Re: FIGlet: how to file an appropriate bug report?
Josh Triplett
Re: FIGlet: how to file an appropriate bug report?
Francesco Poli
Re: FIGlet: how to file an appropriate bug report?
Andrew Suffield
Real names in a football game
Isaac Clerencia
Re: Real names in a football game
David Schleef
Re: Real names in a football game
Florian Weimer
Re: Real names in a football game
Isaac Clerencia
Re: Real names in a football game
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Real names in a football game
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Real names in a football game
Isaac Clerencia
unsubscribe
spam
unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe
Byju_Michael
unsubscribe
Branislav Manic
Unsubscribe
Arnaldo G.Santos
most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Re: most liberal license
Joachim Breitner
Re: most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Re: most liberal license
Glenn Maynard
Re: most liberal license
Don Armstrong
Re: most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Re: most liberal license
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Re: most liberal license
Joachim Breitner
Re: most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Re: most liberal license
Joachim Breitner
Re: most liberal license
Lewis Jardine
Re: most liberal license
Josh Triplett
Re: most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Re: most liberal license
Josh Triplett
Re: most liberal license
tom
Re: Re: most liberal license
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Re: most liberal license
Andrew Suffield
Re: most liberal license
Harald Geyer
Application For job
ammar qazi
Microsoft disc ounts
cph
MTL license
Faheem Mitha
Re: MTL license
Glenn Maynard
Re: MTL license
Glenn Maynard
Re: MTL license
MJ Ray
Re: MTL license
Raul Miller
Re: MTL license
Michael Poole
Re: MTL license
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Re: MTL license
Glenn Maynard
Re: MTL license
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Re: MTL license
Glenn Maynard
Re: MTL license
Nathanael Nerode
(Off-topic) Re: MTL license
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MTL license
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MTL license
Brian M Hunt
Re: MTL license
Matthew Palmer
Re: MTL license
Nathanael Nerode
Re: MTL license
Faheem Mitha
Re: MTL license
Glenn Maynard
Re: MTL license
Nathanael Nerode
Re: MTL license
Francesco Poli
Re: MTL license
Claus Färber
Re: MTL license
Glenn Maynard
Open Software License v2.1
Matthew Wilcox
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Matthew Garrett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Matthew Garrett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Raul Miller
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Josh Triplett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Raul Miller
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Raul Miller
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Josh Triplett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Josh Triplett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Josh Triplett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Matthew Garrett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Joe Moore
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Matthew Garrett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Matthew Garrett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Raul Miller
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Raul Miller
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Josh Triplett
Re: Open Software License v2.1
MJ Ray
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Michael Poole
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Henning Makholm
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Glenn Maynard
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Henning Makholm
Re: Open Software License v2.1
Brian Thomas Sniffen
[
Earlier messages
]
[
Later messages
]