Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Re: requirements for documentation)
> There are many more contentious points that we ought to be able to > enumerate as we did in while creating the DFSG. I shall try to post a > summary, frequently, of guidelines raised to keep discussion progressing[1]. Perhaps an easier way to do this would be to look at the DFSG and work out what changes need to be made. We have a set of freedoms that we believe software should provide - rather than providing an entirely different set of freedoms for documentation, we should try to justify any changes in those freedoms. Personally, I'm inclined to believe that free documentation should have all the freedoms that we think should be provided by free software. Do you believe it needs more freedoms? Fewer freedoms? A slightly different set of freedoms? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]