On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 01:07:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:58:36PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > I believe a maximum of 5 years in a > row with a minimum 1-year suspension before being able to join again > would work well for our tech-ctte.
I think 5 years would be awkward in an 8-member ctte; you'd end up with: 2010: 2 members appointed 2011: 2 members appointed 2012: 1 member appointed 2013: 2 members appointed 2014: 1 member appointed 2015: 2 members replaced ... 4 years is easy (2 members per year), as is 8 years (1 member per year), and 6 years isn't too bad (4 members every three years; or 2 members every year and half). Bumping the ctte size to 10 members could make 5 years work of course. Think it makes sense to have the term proportional to the ctte size though, so turn over can be regular. Cheers, aj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140524072740.gb8...@master.debian.org
