Your message dated Tue, 8 Sep 2026 09:30:44 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1146078: transition: jimtcl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1146078,
regarding transition: jimtcl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1146078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1146078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:jimtcl
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Hi team!
I would like to request the transition of jimtcl from libjim0.83 to libjim0.84.
Ben file:
title = "jimtcl";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libjim0.83" | .depends ~ "libjim0.84";
is_good = .depends ~ "libjim0.84";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libjim0.83";
Affected packages:
- openocd: FTBFS: open #1146077 and one patch is available.
- usb-modeswitch: ok
Please let me know if there are any issues.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1146077
--
Regards,
--
Bo YU
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 08/09/2026 03:57, Bo YU wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 6, 2026 at 11:18 PM Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-09-06 23:08:36 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 05:27:35PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
...
Hi team!
I would like to request the transition of jimtcl from libjim0.83 to libjim0.84.
Go ahead
Thanks, I have uploaded the jimtcl 0.84-2 to unstable and it has been
migrated to testing[0], so I think we can close the issue.
Not yet. libjim0.83 is still in testing. Transitions are done when the
old binary packages are removed from testing.
Thanks for the clarification.
Now it seems there is some change already:
vimer@matebook:~$ rmadison libjim0.83
libjim0.83 | 0.83-2 | stable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf,
i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
vimer@matebook:~$ rmadison libjim0.84
libjim0.84 | 0.84-2 | testing | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
loong64, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
libjim0.84 | 0.84-2 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
loong64, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
But I am still unsure if we can close the issue or not, so just an update here.
Thanks for the notice, we can close this now. Doing so.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
