On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: block -1 by 692980 694131 693560 693639 693641 692809 692505 > > For the record, the following packages are known to FTBFS against libav > 9: > > audacious-plugins: #692505 > audacity: #692809 > electricsheep: #692980 > qutecom: #693560 > vice: #693641 > vtk: #693639 > zoneminder: #694131 > > Setting them as blockers to keep track.
Procedural question: Are these bugs blockers to start the transition? Does the release team require all of them to be fixed in experimental (via MU or NMUs) before uploading libav9 to unstable? -- regards, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJ0ccebHujKKHPO40nGw-RMqfhXrCuA_4eJ12Q3zOiMect=c...@mail.gmail.com