On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump
> this to RC again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8
> just for lilypond's sake, and it is better to act now that there's
> plenty of time before the freeze so that a new version can be uploaded
> (possibly to experimental for the time being) and fixes can be
> applied.

OK. Basically, there's no way that 2.18 will be fixed to work with Guile
2.0, but assuming that 2.20 gets released before stretch, this will be
workable.

> We can discuss this again later in the cycle if necessary, though
> hopefully lilypond can get in shape and we won't need to do that :)

Well, the shape that will be required is the release of a stable
lilypond release which supports guile. Hopefully soon.

> There have been plenty of 'unstable' releases (last one was 2.19.40
> just a few days ago) and those have a --with-guile2 configure switch.
> It may be a good idea to upload that to experimental with guile 2.0
> support?

Sure, but this won't fix the version of lilypond in unstable. [I at
least do not have the time to support a development release of lilypond
through the lifetime of a stable release.]

Are auto-removals from testing currently off? [Basically, I'd like to
avoid having lilypond removed from testing until we're closer to the
release if that's at all possible.]

-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless. 
 -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Reply via email to