Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
Hi, I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.42.0 transition. Currently there is Poppler 0.42.0 in experimental already. This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: - libpoppler57 → libpoppler60 Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their situation, sorted by solutions: Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed: boomaga cups-filters gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape ipe-tools libreoffice pdf2djvu pdf2htmlex popplerkit.framework texlive-bin texworks xpdf Sources that currently FTBFS: * calligra FTBFS for other reasons, not in testing already (can be ignored) Other cases: * derivations This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of that application are left in the resulting arch:all package. A change in poppler-glib 0.39 is the removal of an unused enum; this so far impacted only two sources: - ruby-gnome2 (#812677, fixed) - python-poppler (#812680) OTOH, this issue does not directly affect the libpoppler transition. I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the following usertag: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.39 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.40 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.42 Ben file: title = "poppler 0.42"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libpoppler57" | .depends ~ "libpoppler60"; is_good = .depends ~ "libpoppler60"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libpoppler57"; Thanks, -- Pino