Control: tags -1 confirmed On 10/05/16 14:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 07/05/16 13:34, Pino Toscano wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.42.0 transition. >> Currently there is Poppler 0.42.0 in experimental already. >> >> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: >> - libpoppler57 → libpoppler60 >> >> Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their >> situation, sorted by solutions: >> >> Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed: >> >> boomaga >> cups-filters >> gambas3 >> gdal >> gdcm >> inkscape >> ipe-tools >> libreoffice >> pdf2djvu >> pdf2htmlex >> popplerkit.framework >> texlive-bin >> texworks >> xpdf >> >> Sources that currently FTBFS: >> >> * calligra >> FTBFS for other reasons, not in testing already (can be ignored) >> >> Other cases: >> >> * derivations >> This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is >> only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of >> that application are left in the resulting arch:all package. >> >> A change in poppler-glib 0.39 is the removal of an unused enum; this so >> far impacted only two sources: >> - ruby-gnome2 (#812677, fixed) >> - python-poppler (#812680) >> OTOH, this issue does not directly affect the libpoppler transition. >> >> I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the >> following usertag: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.39 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.40 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.42 > > Let's wait for a few days until the upcoming gdal upload migrates to testing.
Assuming there are no significant build regressions with the new version, you can go ahead. Cheers, Emilio
