On 07/05/16 13:34, Pino Toscano wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.42.0 transition. > Currently there is Poppler 0.42.0 in experimental already. > > This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: > - libpoppler57 → libpoppler60 > > Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their > situation, sorted by solutions: > > Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed: > > boomaga > cups-filters > gambas3 > gdal > gdcm > inkscape > ipe-tools > libreoffice > pdf2djvu > pdf2htmlex > popplerkit.framework > texlive-bin > texworks > xpdf > > Sources that currently FTBFS: > > * calligra > FTBFS for other reasons, not in testing already (can be ignored) > > Other cases: > > * derivations > This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is > only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of > that application are left in the resulting arch:all package. > > A change in poppler-glib 0.39 is the removal of an unused enum; this so > far impacted only two sources: > - ruby-gnome2 (#812677, fixed) > - python-poppler (#812680) > OTOH, this issue does not directly affect the libpoppler transition. > > I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the > following usertag: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.39 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.40 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.42
Let's wait for a few days until the upcoming gdal upload migrates to testing. Emilio