On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Chris Bannister >> <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: >> >> >> >> I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract: >> > >> > Think again. >> > >> > >> >> Our priorities are our users and free software >> >> >> >> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software >> > ^^^^^ >> > Needs NOT wants --- there's a HUGE difference. Ask any married couple >> > what strife this can cause. :) >> >> Well, yeah, but ask any marriage counselor what tends to happen when >> one partner decides arbitrarily what the other needs. > > What does a marriage counselor know about software development? You > should instead ask the marriage counselor what happens if one partner > confuses wants with needs.
You're the one who decided to use marriage as a metaphor. It cuts both ways. -- Joel Rees Be careful where you see conspiracy. Look first in your own heart. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAAr43iN6AJB92eDwzC+wg4=29jxar1o37ptej1z4ggt9_e_...@mail.gmail.com
