On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Chris Bannister
<cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Chris Bannister
>> <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract:
>> >
>> > Think again.
>> >
>> >
>> >> Our priorities are our users and free software
>> >>
>> >>  We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
>> >                             ^^^^^
>> > Needs NOT wants --- there's a HUGE difference. Ask any married couple
>> > what strife this can cause. :)
>>
>> Well, yeah, but ask any marriage counselor what tends to happen when
>> one partner decides arbitrarily what the other needs.
>
> What does a marriage counselor know about software development? You
> should instead ask the marriage counselor what happens if one partner
> confuses wants with needs.

You're the one who decided to use marriage as a metaphor. It cuts both ways.

-- 
Joel Rees

Be careful where you see conspiracy.
Look first in your own heart.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAAr43iN6AJB92eDwzC+wg4=29jxar1o37ptej1z4ggt9_e_...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to