Le Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:42:33 -0500, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> a écrit :
> On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > > Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman: > >> Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in > >> such a way that systemd is never installed, thus avoiding any > >> potential problems that might result from later uninstallation all > >> the dependencies that systemd brings in with it. > > > Please be specific. What problems of of dependencies are you > > talking about? > > Please stop bring up irrelevant questions and address the question > being asked. > > This does require you to at least understand and acknowledge the > difference between a *clean* install, and installing something one > way, then having to uninstall a primary piece and replace it with > something else. > > The two are not the same, and no amount of you trying to act as if > they are will change the fact that they are not. There are no functional differences between an installation with sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is installed later, this is a fact. Allowing the user to choose this at install time from the interface is a "nice to have" feature (wishlist bug) not a RC bug like you were claiming earlier. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141111180749.7e240...@fornost.bigon.be
