-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/11/2014 3:38 AM, John Hasler wrote: > Andrew McGlashan writes: >> I DO NOT WANT SYSTEMD ON ANY SYSTEM THAT I ADMINISTRATE ... is >> that so hard to understand? > > What's hard to understand is why I should give a damn.
Ditto on why I should give a damn about your position. I would like to see Debian move forward, but I see the systemd situation as a clear backwards step. The future of Debian will mean, as it stands today, that systemd will be more important and likely become a necessity even though today "we are not forced to use it" ... and that's just part of the problem. I would prefer Linux kernel with traditional Debian userland with stability and security as major focuses, not the init system or anything else that comes along with systemd lock-in coming in the not too distant future. A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlRyLmwACgkQqBZry7fv4vutPAD/efPbFZzZNXR0oC3wTNIfCfG3 gt5ywQ30+S/gYyTosdkA/j4hEA0fD/aIn+/ypxUxh4QpciPe0ndIYYUpA71qa+LR =QtTR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54722e6e.1070...@affinityvision.com.au
