Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:09:34PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 22/02/2023 23:45, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > [Unit] > > > > Description=A remote mail retrieval and forwarding utility > > > > After=network-online.target opensmtpd.service unbound.service > > > > Requires=opensmtpd.service unbound.service > ... > > In case of my fetchmail setup the culprit is unbound. At the startup > > of unbound it takes some time to exchange keys and so on. > > I have no experience with unbound and I am not sure at which moment it > notifies systemd that the service is ready. However I have found a recent > bug > https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/773 > "When used with systemd-networkd, unbound does not start until > systemd-networkd-wait-online.service times out" > > Perhaps the package in Debian has an older version of the unbound.service > file and so is not affected. > Hi Max,
I have observed lines below in journald: Feb 22 15:41:44 lenovo systemd[1]: Reached target Network is Online. Feb 22 15:41:44 lenovo systemd[1]: Failed to start Wait for Network to be Configured. Feb 22 15:41:44 lenovo systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Feb 22 15:41:44 lenovo systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Feb 22 15:41:44 lenovo systemd-networkd-wait-online[362]: Event loop failed: Connection timed out Feb 22 15:41:25 lenovo systemd[1]: anacron.service: Succeeded. Feb 22 15:41:25 lenovo anacron[3261]: Normal exit (0 jobs run) Feb 22 15:41:25 lenovo anacron[3261]: Anacron 2.3 started on 2023-02-22 Feb 22 15:41:25 lenovo systemd[1]: Started Run anacron jobs. This looks related, thank you very much! I will have a look at the link. > ... > > > However avahi-autoipd should be started concurrently > > > with network configuration to assign link-local address in the case of > > > failure. > > > > In a different thread - it was about IPv6 which has mutated > > slightly - several users claimed that the avahi-autoip is useful for > > their business. > > I mean IPv4 link local addresses 169.254.x.y. My impression is that > avahi-autoipd was created for the cases when there is no point to setup > centralized DHCP server. On the other hand I agree that a router (and so > DHCP out of the box) is more wide spread configuration than connecting a > couple of devices directly or through a switch. I think so, too. Kind regards, Christoph -- Ist die Katze gesund schmeckt sie dem Hund.
