On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > > The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other > kernel might have additional patches. > >> That's why I suggested ignoring the message. > > Then why does reportbug mention the bullseye-backports kernel? >
Because it kind of looks newer if you're a not very bright software construct, he opined.
