On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 18:15 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2023-11-15 16:39:15 -0000, Curt wrote: > > On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > > > > > > The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other > > > kernel might have additional patches. > > > > > > > That's why I suggested ignoring the message. > > > > > > Then why does reportbug mention the bullseye-backports kernel? > > > > Because it kind of looks newer if you're a not very bright software > > construct, he opined. > > But the bookworm-backports kernel is even newer. > So why not this one?
Because it's a different package? bookworm-backports has a linux-6.5 package which is not a newer version of the linux-6.1 package it's totally separate as far as the packaging system is concerned. -- Tixy
