On 2023-11-15 16:39:15 -0000, Curt wrote: > On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > > > > The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other > > kernel might have additional patches. > > > >> That's why I suggested ignoring the message. > > > > Then why does reportbug mention the bullseye-backports kernel? > > Because it kind of looks newer if you're a not very bright software > construct, he opined.
But the bookworm-backports kernel is even newer. So why not this one? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
