Lists (12024-07-16): > In that case you were correct. I had found posts online where people were > pointing in the direction of systemd and due to the problem with > systemd-cryptsetup you warned us about I was inclined to take those posts at > face value. It seems that was not "fair".
That happens. Note that the systemd-cryptsetup I had is not the fault of systemd either: Package: systemd-cryptsetup Source: systemd It happened because Debian chose to split it into a separate package, probably to avoid pulling libcryptsetup and its dependencies into the core system. Regards, -- Nicolas George
