On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:21:27PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > I would say it as: > > "For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. > For those who do not, none is worthwhile." > > I think it's not impossible that some (more) of the opponents could be > made to understand why people might disagree with them. But I can't > imagine any even theoretically possible scenarios where this would > change their opinion, so there's no point wasting the effort.
I would say it as: "This isn't about reasons, it's about being unreasonable." -- Raul
