On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:20:44AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Given that we've just had significant turnover in th TC, might it not make 
> sense to have the first term expirations set for a year or two from now?  
> That 
> would keep this discussion well separated from any current turmoil and I 
> think 
> it's reasonably clear that we don't, at the moment, suffer from a lack of 
> turnover in the TC (which AIUI is the motivation for this).

I was reluctant to propose this myself, but I do agree with you. The
*preexisting* problem of basically 0 turnover in the ctte is basically
solved and AFAICT for reasons completely independent from the ongoing
work on this GR. What still needs to be put in place is some rule that
avoid the problem reappears in the future.

So I would personally be in favor of dropping entirely the transitional
measure----FWIW Lucas (original proposer of the measure) has also hinted
at that possibility in <20141119210924.ga28...@xanadu.blop.info>.

I do not understand the reason why AJ in
<20141119220621.ga31...@master.debian.org> stated that he would favor
either of the "2" and "2-R" model over "2 without transitional measure".
So I might be missing something.

I welcome comments on whether people would be against having the "2"
model without the transitional measure, as suggested by Scott (and
Lucas). It certainly is an option that scores very well on the Occam's
Razor scale.

I will note down this in TODO.

Cheers.

[ As a more general status update: as it seems that both the "2" and
  "2-R" model has significant support, I'm working on integrating "2-R"
  in my Git repo as a separate proposal, so that we can easily vote on
  both if they both receive enough seconds (or are proposed by the
  DPL. More on this in a separate mail. ]

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to