Devan Mardyks <[email protected]> writes: > Right I do see that none of the above is an option. In the event that > option is the majority, restarting the process takes up more time.
> Giving the other two candidates an exemption and updating the > constitution to prevent single person elections feels like a more future > proof path forward for maintaining democratic values. If you would like to change the Debian constitution, there is a process for doing that. There is no special constitution changer who is responsible for editing it. Someone who cares has to propose an amendment that passes a GR with the required threshold. The Debian constitution is a foundation document. We follow it until we change it, and we follow our process for changing it. We don't make things up on the fly. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
