Hi Jessica, On 13/08/26 at 10:57 +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote: > On 13 Aug 2026, at 06:20, Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 13/08/26 at 08:04 +0800, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >> As far as I know, devotee has never been tried with 10 options. I > >> think it only supports 1 digit for the ranking, and might use base 36. > >> If 10 options make it, I will probably have to test this first and > >> might postpone the vote until I can confirm it works properly. > > > > If you don't mind reading AI-generated commits, > > https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/devotee/-/commits/35options might be > > helpful. (The commits are intentionally verbose, and you probably don't > > want to add doc/max-options.md and AGENTS.md, but I left them in the > > commit history) > > I can’t be the only one who finds this quite tasteless given the > context of the GR? Especially after the pushback already present > earlier for the AI-generated GR summary page?
I stand by what I wrote earlier in the discussion: I will of course respect the outcome of the GR, and reconsider my Debian contributions in the light of it (probably stopping my contributions if some options win, because I don't think I'll find the motivation to continue). But in the meantime, I don't see why I should respect a rule that does not exist yet. Also, in this specific context, 1/ I am interested in closing this topic as soon as possible. There is a summer project for Debian I wanted to work on that I haven't touched yet, both cause this discussion ate most of my computer time, and because it would not make sense to work on it and then discover that it's not welcomed (because AI-assisted). 2/ I would have been totally fine with Kurt ignoring my email, or answering "no sorry no LLM output for me". 3/ It has been interesting to me to understand how devotee works[1] in the process. Lucas [1] https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/devotee/-/blob/35options/AGENTS.md (warning: AI-generated, obviously)
