On 13/08/26 at 13:00 +0200, Matthias Geiger wrote: > Aug 13, 2026 11:57:54 Jessica Clarke <[email protected]>: > > > On 13 Aug 2026, at 06:20, Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 13/08/26 at 08:04 +0800, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >>> As far as I know, devotee has never been tried with 10 options. I > >>> think it only supports 1 digit for the ranking, and might use base 36. > >>> If 10 options make it, I will probably have to test this first and > >>> might postpone the vote until I can confirm it works properly. > >> > >> If you don't mind reading AI-generated commits, > >> https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/devotee/-/commits/35options might be > >> helpful. (The commits are intentionally verbose, and you probably don't > >> want to add doc/max-options.md and AGENTS.md, but I left them in the > >> commit history) > > > > I can’t be the only one who finds this quite tasteless given the > > context of the GR? Especially after the pushback already present > > earlier for the AI-generated GR summary page? > > > > Indeed. While we are discussing that, the least courtesy I would expect is to > refrain from using it for discussion /vote-related context. > This leaves a rather bitter taste in my mouth. Why should I bother engaging > in a discussion when a word generator takes my mail and emits some kind of > response? This feels disrespectful, and tiring.
My email points to devotee commits to fix support for votes with more than 9 options. So I don't understand what you are referring to. Lucas
