In general I've been impressed by the discourse in the GR threads. I've been happily talking about that to people. But...
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 12:48:37PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > >My take is the constantly changing, strident positions of people who >are anti-LLM (it's about environment! even if it's not significant, >it's a position statement! it's about copyright! but it's even just >adding an unlock, if it comes from an LLM, it's evil and should be a >violation of the code of conduct, even if we can't tell if the >one-line change came from a human or not!, etc.) is similarly >disrespectful to the intelligence of the people in the debate. You've multiple times belittled the reasonable and valid concerns that a range of different people have expressed about LLM usage, and you're *still* doing it. *Please* stop doing this, you know better. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] The two hard things in computing: * naming things * cache invalidation * off-by-one errors -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
