On 13/08/26 at 16:52 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote: > > > > If you don't mind reading AI-generated commits, > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/devotee/-/commits/35options might be > > > helpful. (The commits are intentionally verbose, and you probably don't > > > want to add doc/max-options.md and AGENTS.md, but I left them in the > > > commit history) > > > > I can’t be the only one who finds this quite tasteless given the > > context of the GR? Especially after the pushback already present > > earlier for the AI-generated GR summary page? > > Indeed you aren't, and a similar stunt was equally seen as tastless by > several people a week or so ago. > > My cynical takeaway is that it may feel less important to build > community when one gets a slave yes-chatbot to talk to, which may or may > not be what is going on, but I take it as another data point of what > kind of social direction a fully-AI-enhanced Debian may be likely to > take
So your take is that ignoring Kurt's email about devotee's support for votes with >9 options would contribute to building community? (And no, I had no time to look at devotee manually, and I doubt that it would have triggered a lot of interest from others, given it only saw 11 commits since 2017) Lucas
