Hi Andreas On 2026/08/14 09:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
I insist in the idea that we could perfectly go without a patch for devotee if we would first sit together and draft options that are easier to decide about. As Antonio wrote before[1] we havea) ban LLM-assisted contributions completely b) tolerate LLM-assisted contributions under a set of constraints. I would prefer if we work on a sensible wording for those options first and vote about these afterwards.
I hate throwing a spanner in the works, but I tend to agree with the above and think that it might be a worth-while excercise to draft these two options, and see how much of the current options could be folded in to these options in a way that satisfies most people. Then if there's some nuance that really doesn't fit, it could be an additional option.
I know there are those who feel that further discussion is a burden, and those who even want to halt possibility of further discussion altogether, but whatever the result of the GR is, it's happening in a storm where the weather is most probably going to look a lot different in a year from now or even 5 years from now, so I hope that whatever the result of this particular GR, that people don't take a knee-jerk reaction to it and that we can continue to refine our position as the world around us changes.
-Jonathan
