Hm:
"In the past 772.9 days, it has been listed 19 times for a
total of 3.1 days"
Sound's like it works as designed - because of the volume of legit mail,
it is only listed for a few hours each time. A total of THREE days out of
roughly 800?
Again
- why not use a weighting system? If this AOL machine is listed by SpamCop
but is used to send AOL mail, then what other tests is legit mail failing to
cause it to be held or deleted?
Im my
case, SPAMCOP is 70% of the "hold" weight - and I have yet to see legit AOL mail
being reported as "lost". Best
Regards |
Title: Message
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests Colbeck, Andrew
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Test... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Sp... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about... Joshua Levitsky
- Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some S... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about... Sanford Whiteman
- RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Quest... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ques... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ques... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question abo... Markus Gufler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question... Joshua Levitsky
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL ... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL ... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL ... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL ... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL ... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL ... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ques... Matt