Dan,
 
1. 3.0.3 in our testing has been considerably quicker than that of earlier
versions of Declude.
2. We have never seen an long delay in the processing of email and no one
else has reported this.
3. As mentioned on the Beta page there are still issues with orphan files
due to Hijack, but this is because the hijack is moving the email to the
HOLD2 folder and leaving files behind, these email should not be legitimate.
4. The only other reasons we are aware of for orphan files is - if the files
already exist in the location (eg Spam folder) then the files cannot be
moved from the \work directory to that location.
5. In order to find the cause please send us your log files / copy of an
orphaned email / config files for us to look at the situation ?
6. In addition to the lists, in future it would be a good idea to email us
at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with issues you are experiencing so we can deal with
them promptly.

Thanks
David B
www.declude.com
 
________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running Declude with
imail8.21???


3.0.3.  Mail has backed up repeatedly since installing this version.  We
originally installed 3.0 when it was released, but quickly backed off that
when the service stopped on its own, leaving multiple files in the proc
directory.  After waiting a while, we got an email about 3.0.3 being
released which seemed to specifically target the problems we had, so we
again immediately installed that version (on Sep 2).  The results were OK
until the weekend when mail piled up for an unknown reason.  We just waited
that one out, and the next one which occurred Monday afternoon.  The one
from yesterday though caused an hour-long delay in email delivery.  Today
the decision was made to cease the beta test and revert back to 1.82.  The
change was made this morning at around 9:00 AM EST, and the files I noted
are still in the work directory now, 5 hours later.
 
I just want to note that the same server never backs up running 1.82.  I
notice that there is now a version 3.0.3.4, but we of course haven't tried
that version.  FWIW, we are using all three Declude products including
Hijack.

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:04 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running Declude with
imail8.21???


Dan,
 
What version for Declude Beta were you running? As we have not seen the
behavior you are referring to.

David B
www.declude.com

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:58 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running Declude with
imail8.21???


Yes, we just today reverted back to 1.82 because our single-processor
machine backed up.  At the worst there was an hour delay in delivery.  I
specifically denoted it was a single-processor machine just to indicate that
our problems would not be related to the multi-processor sleep problems.  It
just doesn't seem able to handle the load that 1.82 does.  And yes, we have
increased our THREADS to 25.  
 
Also, they claim to have fixed a problem with leftover files, but after
swapping out the Declude executable with 1.82 and leaving the Decludeproc
service running, 24 files are still stranded in the "spool\proc\work"
directory and there are 9 *.vir directories still in there (they are truly
stranded, even the 24 files comprise 12 paired q and d files they are not
being delivered for several hours with the Decludeproc service still
running.  I am going to have to move them back into the spool directory
manually).  The Decludeproc service has NOT stopped running at all in the
several days it has been running, so I don't know why the files are
stranded.  I just tried restarting it to see if I could "wake it up", but it
didn't give me any love.  Looking at the dates, I see one q/d pair from Sep
2, several from Sep 7 and the 2 pair from today.  Each one of these
represents a "lost" email.  I opened a few and didn't find any of them to be
spam.  The one thing I can't abide is "lost" email, so I had to stop our
beta test.
 
 
 
 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:11 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running Declude with
imail8.21???


IMail 8.20+ is only compatible with Declude 3+, but that software is still
in early beta and I wouldn't recommend it.  This combination can work, but
it appears that the higher the volume you have, the more likely you are to
experience serious issues with E-mail backing up.  I have been using IMail
8.15 HF2 for many months without any new issues, and it works very well with
Declude 2.0.6.16 (the most recent interim release) which also doesn't have
any new issues.  The newer Declude 3.0 that is in beta is basically the same
in terms of functionality, but it is changed to act as a service in order to
resolve issues with the changes in IMail 8.20+ and also increase performance
slightly.  This is a big change for Declude, and building a service to
handle E-mail reliably isn't a small feat so I would suggest being patient
in the mean time.

Matt



Timothy Bohen wrote: 

        Oh ouch, thats embarrising, you could have sent this off list!!! :)
I KNOW I didnt change that path, is there any chance upgrading to 8.21
somehow changed it? 
        
        So anyway, now that I downgraded already, should I go to 8.21 again
or are there problems with declude? I'm not crazy about running a beta
version of declude.
        
        Thanks
        
        
        
        ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
        From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
        Date:  Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:28:41 -0400
        
          

                        I gave up and downgraded to 8.15 now I'm getting:
                        09:07 15:08 SMTPD(CP) error 3 executing
"c:\imail\Declude.exe" 
                              

                "D:\IMAIL\spool\Q3ab90041008c0e76.SMD"
                
                It looks like you set up Declude to run in C:\IMail, but you
run IMail 
                on D:\IMail.  :)
                                      -Scott
                ---
                This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
                unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and
                type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be
found
                at http://www.mail-archive.com.
                
                    

         
        
         
        ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
        Sent via the CMS Internet Webmail system at mail1.cmsinter.net
        
        
         
                           
        ---
        This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
        unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
        type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
        at http://www.mail-archive.com.
        
        
          


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to