Hi Matt,

No, I understood completely.  I've seen forms with fields hidden by DIVs still 
filled out.  Some of the less sophisticated spam form fillers I've seen used 
simply filled out every field.  They were not looking to see what was "visible" 
and what wasn't.

CAPTCHA is easy as well... takes similarly just a few minutes to add since 
there is so much code in the public domain... and it is much more difficult to 
bypass than a hidden DIV is.  I'm not saying it's perfect since it is possible 
that OCR could be developed to be smart enough to bypass CAPTCHA (though it has 
not to date), and it does require an extra step by the website visitor, but it 
certainly appears to be the best method currently, and no more difficult to 
implement than others that I've seen.

Darin.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Matt 
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter


Darin,

I think you missed what I was saying exactly.  If the form spammer fills out 
the fields that are hidden by DIV's, the E-mail wouldn't be sent by the mailer 
script and it would pretend to have been successful.

Spammers use programs to do this stuff, and although they are intelligent 
programs, they almost definitely will target fields named "Name" and "E-mail", 
and if on their first try they fill these fields in and they get a positive 
response from the script, their program will stop trying to fix issues.

I won't claim that this method is 100% effective, but I have used it in some 
cases and no one ever said that it didn't do the trick for them.  If they got 
through that trick, I would ban URL's with a JavaScript alert and then silently 
with the mailer script (figuring that no real people would get a URL to the 
mailer script).

This is the easiest of all methods to implement.  It takes 5 to 10 minutes to 
fix a form and you don't hinder your visitors with CAPTCHAs.  It's not like 
there isn't code being used by spammers elsewhere that read CAPTCHA's anyway, 
though I suspect that the current form spammers are not doing that right now.

Matt



Darin Cox wrote: 
  Hi Matt,

  Some do, some don't.  I've seen both methods used on some customer sites.

  Setting session variables on the form page definitely wouldn't work, as a 
spammer that hits the form would receive the same session information anyone 
else would.

  Certainly checking data against constraints is _always_ important, whether to 
prevent hacking, avoid data exceptions, enforce business rules, etc.

  The method you outline seems like it would only work if the spammer doesn't 
submit to all fields.  Some of the attempts we've seen populated all fields, so 
this wouldn't work on those.

  I'd stick with CAPTCHA as the best and most foolproof method to avoid these 
problems.  It's fairly easy to implement (there are a number of free examples 
in public domain), is familiar to most people filling out the forms, and works 
well.

  Darin.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matt 
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:55 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter


  The form spammers are smarter than to go directly to the mail script.  They 
will hit for the form submission page with what appears to be IE and submit the 
form.  They even handle cookies correctly.

  The trick for form spam is to take fields like your Name and E-mail and 
rename the variables to something like "ignore-old-data1" and 
"ignore-old-data2" and adjust your mailer script for the new names.  Then you 
insert new form fields in the form page that are hidden with a DIV and call 
them Name and E-mail.  Your mailer script should pretend that the E-mail was 
successful if these fields have data in them, but you should simply 86 the 
actual message.  This will trick their testing software into thinking that they 
were successful, and the DIV's with visibility hidden will not be seen by 
normal visitors.  You might also want to put some javascript in the form 
submission page that looks for a URL in the form and warn the submitter that 
they can't send URL's, and then also have the mailer script silently reject a 
submission that has a URL in it.  RegEx would be required in both JavaScript 
and the ASP or whatever code to do the URL checking.

  As far as I know, this seems to work perfectly, but setting session variables 
on the form page doesn't do a damn thing.

  Matt



  Darin Cox wrote: 
    Since forms all use different emailers, and the form content is different 
as well, your only hope is content filtering based on what the spammer 
submitted... like SURBL filtering or REGEX on the spammer submission.

    These days, web-based form processing pages should minimally check that the 
referring page is what it is supposed to be (i.e. the form page submit button 
was clicked as opposed to a spammer submitting directly to the form action 
URL), and better yet implement CAPTCHA, require a login, or some other similar 
security measure.

    Darin.


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Craig Edmonds 
    To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
    Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:16 AM
    Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter


    Hi All,


    Is there a filter for form spam?


    Some clients complain that they get form spammers sending in junk via their 
web forms.

    Some clients have captchas on their forms some don't, but I would like to 
be able to filter out the junk at declude level.


    Any ideas?


    Kindest Regards
    Craig Edmonds
    123 Marbella Internet
    W: www.123marbella.com
    E : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


    LEGAL DISCLAIMER - This message may contain confidential, proprietary or 
legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the 
addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message 
you are hereby informed that you must not use, disseminate, copy it in any form 
or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in 
error please delete it and any copies of it and notify it to the sender. 


    AVISO LEGAL - Este mensaje puede contener informacion confidencial, en 
propiedad o legalmente protegida y esta dirigida unicamente para el uso de la 
persona destinataria. Si usted no es la persona destinataria de este mensaje, 
por la presente se le comunica que no debe usar, difundir, copiar de ninguna 
forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion con ella.



    ---
    This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
    unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
    type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
    at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
    ---
    This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
    unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
    type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
    at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to