-1 for supporting Java5

Let Microsoft deal with the legacy stuff ^^

Regards,
Jakob

2011/12/28 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>:
> - 0,5 on supporting Java5
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> Since we have quite a few vetos against Java5 usage for this new project, 
>> I'd say we go with Java6. Java7 is right around the corner, and Java5 is 
>> really only legacy now. If projects still need to use java5, they can of 
>> course also use Seam3 and CODI until they hava moved their servers.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 10:44 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider
>>>
>>> If we wanted to try it later that's fine.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:41, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  We could try to use retro-translate to produce java5 compatible artifacts
>>>>  later?
>>>>
>>>>  LieGrue,
>>>>  strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>>  > From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
>>>>  > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>  > Cc:
>>>>  > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:45 AM
>>>>  > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider
>>>>  >
>>>>  > We have it in Seam, and Weld for that Java 5 support, but I'd
>>> prefer to
>>>>  > stay on 6+. We *could* do a version compiled for jdk5. But then we get
>>>>  into
>>>>  > issues of which branch, making sure it's all Java 5 features, etc.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > -0.5
>>>>  >
>>>>  > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:45, José Rodolfo Freitas <
>>>>  > joserodolfo.frei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  >
>>>>  >>  +0
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>  On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>>  >>  gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>  > hi john,
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>  > this feature won't prevent users from using deltaspike
>>> with candi
>>>>  >>  > (even >if< candi only supports java6+).
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>  > regards,
>>>>  >>  > gerhard
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>  > 2011/12/22 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>  > > Hi Gerhard,
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  > > How about resin (CanDI)?
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  > > John
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>>  >>  > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  > > > hi john,
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > the impl. would >not< be bound to a cdi
>>> impl.
>>>>  >>  > > > owb as well as weld (see [1]) support java5.
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > regards,
>>>>  >>  > > > gerhard
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > [1]
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/weld/core/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/util/ServiceLoader.java
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > 2011/12/22 John D. Ament
>>> <john.d.am...@gmail.com>
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > -1
>>>>  >>  > > > > Java5 is past EOL at this point.  Not
>>> suitable for
>>>>  > production
>>>>  >>  > > deployments
>>>>  >>  > > > > from my perspective.  Java EE 6 (since any
>>> code we
>>>>  > write for delta
>>>>  >>  > > spike
>>>>  >>  > > > is
>>>>  >>  > > > > against EE6) is for Java SE 6.  Even if the
>>>>  > implementation is using
>>>>  >>  > > Java
>>>>  >>  > > > 5
>>>>  >>  > > > > at compilation time, the runtime is 6; and I
>>> would hope
>>>>  > we would
>>>>  >>  code
>>>>  >>  > > > > against spec rather than specific impls.
>>>>  >>  > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > John
>>>>  >>  > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Gerhard
>>> Petracek <
>>>>  >>  > > > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  >>  > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > hi @ all,
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > fyi: please check [1] before you answer.
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > [2] is the implementation used in owb. i
>>> suggest
>>>>  > to start with it
>>>>  >>  > > > > (instead
>>>>  >>  > > > > > of the version of codi), because the
>>> version of
>>>>  > codi provides
>>>>  >>  > > > additional
>>>>  >>  > > > > > mechanisms we might need later on (if we
>>> include
>>>>  > the
>>>>  >>  corresponding
>>>>  >>  > > > > > features).
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > the basic concept:
>>>>  >>  > > > > > ServiceProvider (btw.
>>> DefaultLoaderService) is a
>>>>  > custom
>>>>  >>  > > implementation
>>>>  >>  > > > of
>>>>  >>  > > > > > the ServiceLoader mechanism which allows
>>> to use
>>>>  > codi with java
>>>>  >>  1.5
>>>>  >>  > > (if
>>>>  >>  > > > > the
>>>>  >>  > > > > > cdi container allows it as well).
>>>>  >>  > > > > > in case of java6+ the std. ServiceLoader
>>> gets
>>>>  > used.
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > please send
>>>>  >>  > > > > > +1, +0 or -1 because...
>>>>  >>  > > > > > for the basic idea as well as the basic
>>> concept.
>>>>  >>  > > > > > if there are >basic< objections,
>>> please also
>>>>  > add them to [3]
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > regards,
>>>>  >>  > > > > > gerhard
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > > [1]
>>> http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp
>>>>  >>  > > > > > [2]
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.1.3/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/DefaultLoaderService.java
>>>>  >>  > > > > > [3]
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>
>>>>  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking
>>>>  >>  > > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > > >
>>>>  >>  > > >
>>>>  >>  > >
>>>>  >>  >
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > --
>>>>  > Jason Porter
>>>>  > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
>>>>  > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Software Engineer
>>>>  > Open Source Advocate
>>>>  > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>>>>  >
>>>>  > PGP key id: 926CCFF5
>>>>  > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason Porter
>>> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
>>> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>>>
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Open Source Advocate
>>> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>>>
>>> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
>>> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at

Reply via email to