Seam3 is primarily Java6 :-) https://github.com/seam/parent/blob/master/pom.xml#L722
We could always go the route of adding a classifier release version, right? On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > oki, seems the majority is for dropping Java5 support. I've upgraded the > parent pom to language target level 1.6 already. > > > Please note that this doesn't mean that we drop JavaEE-5 support! I still > like to support CDI containers running on EE-5 if possible. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> > > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:47 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider > > > > -1 for supporting Java5 > > > > Let Microsoft deal with the legacy stuff ^^ > > > > Regards, > > Jakob > > > > 2011/12/28 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: > >> - 0,5 on supporting Java5 > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > > wrote: > >>> Since we have quite a few vetos against Java5 usage for this new > > project, I'd say we go with Java6. Java7 is right around the corner, and > > Java5 is really only legacy now. If projects still need to use java5, > they can > > of course also use Seam3 and CODI until they hava moved their servers. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> > >>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>> Cc: > >>>> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 10:44 AM > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider > >>>> > >>>> If we wanted to try it later that's fine. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:41, Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> We could try to use retro-translate to produce java5 > > compatible artifacts > >>>>> later? > >>>>> > >>>>> LieGrue, > >>>>> strub > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> > From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> > >>>>> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> > Cc: > >>>>> > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:45 AM > >>>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider > >>>>> > > >>>>> > We have it in Seam, and Weld for that Java 5 support, but > > I'd > >>>> prefer to > >>>>> > stay on 6+. We *could* do a version compiled for jdk5. > > But then we get > >>>>> into > >>>>> > issues of which branch, making sure it's all Java 5 > > features, etc. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > -0.5 > >>>>> > > >>>>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:45, José Rodolfo Freitas < > >>>>> > joserodolfo.frei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> >> +0 > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gerhard Petracek > > < > >>>>> >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > hi john, > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > this feature won't prevent users from using > > deltaspike > >>>> with candi > >>>>> >> > (even >if< candi only supports java6+). > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > regards, > >>>>> >> > gerhard > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > 2011/12/22 John D. Ament > > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > Hi Gerhard, > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > How about resin (CanDI)? > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > John > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Gerhard > > Petracek < > >>>>> >> > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > hi john, > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > the impl. would >not< be bound > > to a cdi > >>>> impl. > >>>>> >> > > > owb as well as weld (see [1]) support > > java5. > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > regards, > >>>>> >> > > > gerhard > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > [1] > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>> > > > https://github.com/weld/core/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/util/ServiceLoader.java > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > 2011/12/22 John D. Ament > >>>> <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > -1 > >>>>> >> > > > > Java5 is past EOL at this > > point. Not > >>>> suitable for > >>>>> > production > >>>>> >> > > deployments > >>>>> >> > > > > from my perspective. Java EE 6 > > (since any > >>>> code we > >>>>> > write for delta > >>>>> >> > > spike > >>>>> >> > > > is > >>>>> >> > > > > against EE6) is for Java SE 6. > > Even if the > >>>>> > implementation is using > >>>>> >> > > Java > >>>>> >> > > > 5 > >>>>> >> > > > > at compilation time, the runtime > > is 6; and I > >>>> would hope > >>>>> > we would > >>>>> >> code > >>>>> >> > > > > against spec rather than > > specific impls. > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > John > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:41 PM, > > Gerhard > >>>> Petracek < > >>>>> >> > > > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > hi @ all, > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > fyi: please check [1] > > before you answer. > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > [2] is the implementation > > used in owb. i > >>>> suggest > >>>>> > to start with it > >>>>> >> > > > > (instead > >>>>> >> > > > > > of the version of codi), > > because the > >>>> version of > >>>>> > codi provides > >>>>> >> > > > additional > >>>>> >> > > > > > mechanisms we might need > > later on (if we > >>>> include > >>>>> > the > >>>>> >> corresponding > >>>>> >> > > > > > features). > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > the basic concept: > >>>>> >> > > > > > ServiceProvider (btw. > >>>> DefaultLoaderService) is a > >>>>> > custom > >>>>> >> > > implementation > >>>>> >> > > > of > >>>>> >> > > > > > the ServiceLoader mechanism > > which allows > >>>> to use > >>>>> > codi with java > >>>>> >> 1.5 > >>>>> >> > > (if > >>>>> >> > > > > the > >>>>> >> > > > > > cdi container allows it as > > well). > >>>>> >> > > > > > in case of java6+ the std. > > ServiceLoader > >>>> gets > >>>>> > used. > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > please send > >>>>> >> > > > > > +1, +0 or -1 because... > >>>>> >> > > > > > for the basic idea as well > > as the basic > >>>> concept. > >>>>> >> > > > > > if there are >basic< > > objections, > >>>> please also > >>>>> > add them to [3] > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > regards, > >>>>> >> > > > > > gerhard > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > [1] > >>>> http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp > >>>>> >> > > > > > [2] > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.1.3/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/DefaultLoaderService.java > >>>>> >> > > > > > [3] > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > -- > >>>>> > Jason Porter > >>>>> > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > >>>>> > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Software Engineer > >>>>> > Open Source Advocate > >>>>> > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception > > Handling > >>>>> > > >>>>> > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > >>>>> > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jason Porter > >>>> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > >>>> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > >>>> > >>>> Software Engineer > >>>> Open Source Advocate > >>>> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling > >>>> > >>>> PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > >>>> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > >>>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > -- > > Jakob Korherr > > > > blog: http://www.jakobk.com > > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr > > work: http://www.irian.at > > >
