oki, seems the majority is for dropping Java5 support. I've upgraded the parent pom to language target level 1.6 already.
Please note that this doesn't mean that we drop JavaEE-5 support! I still like to support CDI containers running on EE-5 if possible. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:47 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider > > -1 for supporting Java5 > > Let Microsoft deal with the legacy stuff ^^ > > Regards, > Jakob > > 2011/12/28 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >> - 0,5 on supporting Java5 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > wrote: >>> Since we have quite a few vetos against Java5 usage for this new > project, I'd say we go with Java6. Java7 is right around the corner, and > Java5 is really only legacy now. If projects still need to use java5, they > can > of course also use Seam3 and CODI until they hava moved their servers. >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> >>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 10:44 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider >>>> >>>> If we wanted to try it later that's fine. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:41, Mark Struberg > <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We could try to use retro-translate to produce java5 > compatible artifacts >>>>> later? >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> > From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> >>>>> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>> > Cc: >>>>> > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:45 AM >>>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-28] ServiceProvider >>>>> > >>>>> > We have it in Seam, and Weld for that Java 5 support, but > I'd >>>> prefer to >>>>> > stay on 6+. We *could* do a version compiled for jdk5. > But then we get >>>>> into >>>>> > issues of which branch, making sure it's all Java 5 > features, etc. >>>>> > >>>>> > -0.5 >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:45, José Rodolfo Freitas < >>>>> > joserodolfo.frei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> +0 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gerhard Petracek > < >>>>> >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > hi john, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > this feature won't prevent users from using > deltaspike >>>> with candi >>>>> >> > (even >if< candi only supports java6+). >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > regards, >>>>> >> > gerhard >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > 2011/12/22 John D. Ament > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > > Hi Gerhard, >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > How about resin (CanDI)? >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > John >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Gerhard > Petracek < >>>>> >> > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > > hi john, >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > the impl. would >not< be bound > to a cdi >>>> impl. >>>>> >> > > > owb as well as weld (see [1]) support > java5. >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > regards, >>>>> >> > > > gerhard >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > [1] >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> > https://github.com/weld/core/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/util/ServiceLoader.java >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > 2011/12/22 John D. Ament >>>> <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > > -1 >>>>> >> > > > > Java5 is past EOL at this > point. Not >>>> suitable for >>>>> > production >>>>> >> > > deployments >>>>> >> > > > > from my perspective. Java EE 6 > (since any >>>> code we >>>>> > write for delta >>>>> >> > > spike >>>>> >> > > > is >>>>> >> > > > > against EE6) is for Java SE 6. > Even if the >>>>> > implementation is using >>>>> >> > > Java >>>>> >> > > > 5 >>>>> >> > > > > at compilation time, the runtime > is 6; and I >>>> would hope >>>>> > we would >>>>> >> code >>>>> >> > > > > against spec rather than > specific impls. >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > John >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:41 PM, > Gerhard >>>> Petracek < >>>>> >> > > > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > hi @ all, >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > fyi: please check [1] > before you answer. >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > [2] is the implementation > used in owb. i >>>> suggest >>>>> > to start with it >>>>> >> > > > > (instead >>>>> >> > > > > > of the version of codi), > because the >>>> version of >>>>> > codi provides >>>>> >> > > > additional >>>>> >> > > > > > mechanisms we might need > later on (if we >>>> include >>>>> > the >>>>> >> corresponding >>>>> >> > > > > > features). >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > the basic concept: >>>>> >> > > > > > ServiceProvider (btw. >>>> DefaultLoaderService) is a >>>>> > custom >>>>> >> > > implementation >>>>> >> > > > of >>>>> >> > > > > > the ServiceLoader mechanism > which allows >>>> to use >>>>> > codi with java >>>>> >> 1.5 >>>>> >> > > (if >>>>> >> > > > > the >>>>> >> > > > > > cdi container allows it as > well). >>>>> >> > > > > > in case of java6+ the std. > ServiceLoader >>>> gets >>>>> > used. >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > please send >>>>> >> > > > > > +1, +0 or -1 because... >>>>> >> > > > > > for the basic idea as well > as the basic >>>> concept. >>>>> >> > > > > > if there are >basic< > objections, >>>> please also >>>>> > add them to [3] >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > regards, >>>>> >> > > > > > gerhard >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > [1] >>>> http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp >>>>> >> > > > > > [2] >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.1.3/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/DefaultLoaderService.java >>>>> >> > > > > > [3] >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Jason Porter >>>>> > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >>>>> > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >>>>> > >>>>> > Software Engineer >>>>> > Open Source Advocate >>>>> > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception > Handling >>>>> > >>>>> > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >>>>> > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jason Porter >>>> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >>>> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >>>> >>>> Software Engineer >>>> Open Source Advocate >>>> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling >>>> >>>> PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >>>> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > -- > Jakob Korherr > > blog: http://www.jakobk.com > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr > work: http://www.irian.at >
