@ romain: imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it later on again), if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately). anybody is welcome to work on DS-333.
@ DS-288 it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll finish it once DS-289 is done. (yes we need it for 0.4) @ xml-config afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked on it. regards, gerhard 2013/3/26 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for now makes sense, > we can enrich this further in another release. How about we close 113 as a > reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items? I see you already > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a case as well. > > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in 0.4 or can it > wait? > > Romain, I didn't quite get you. Are you saying you're on hold on this one > (dependent on something?). > > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? (DS-269 to 272). I'd > prefer to move it. > > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since it's needed for > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix? > > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these? There are other > catch like issues out there. Are they needed? > > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/ > > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1] > > John > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789 > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Hi > > > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it > > > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and keep > > interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm part right > > now it can work but then the question will be which shade version? a > proxy > > as in cxf?....) > > > > other are not blocker IMO > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > @ examples: > > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here > > > > > > @ DS-60 > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after 0.4) > > > > > > @ DS-113 > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module > > > (i'll create the module today) > > > > > > @ DS-263 > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 > > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to know what > you > > > need) > > > > > > @ DS-278 > > > i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo. > > > however, it isn't a real blocker > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things started > to > > > move > > > > towards a 0.4 release. I created the filter at [1] to show our > current > > > > progress. > > > > > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved for the > > > > release. Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking that we've > > > > actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization (note: > I'll > > > use > > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is TL;DR) > > > > > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we need more? > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query. Should this > > > have > > > > spawned child tasks? > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently it works > > just > > > > like the Seam3 version. Can this be closed? > > > > > > > > > > > > Some low hanging fruit: > > > > > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as well. > I've > > > been > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary release > > would > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. If this isn't complete, do we need it > > in > > > > 0.4? > > > > > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add. > > > > > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too difficult > in > > > > either CODI or Seam3. > > > > > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 but is a > > > blocker > > > > for the release. I'll update it as such. > > > > > > > > If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be (e.g. it's > > not > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled. Since previously only > > 289 > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at everything else. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 > > > > > > > > > >
