+1 LieGrue, strub
----- Original Message ----- > From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> > To: "deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org" > <deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:03 PM > Subject: Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release > > I doubt it. I've responded (I believe) to all of them and the original > reporters have not given feedback either way. I interpret that as > > * Thanks, that works, or > * I no longer care > > People can always open more tickets if they feel it's still an issue and we > can dig further. > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:40 AM, John D. Ament > <john.d.am...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Ok. How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of those are needed >> for 0.4? >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I >> figured >> > it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly > add it >> in >> > post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it. >> > — >> > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Jason, >> > > Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to > DeltaSpike, even >> > > though it was already voted in? >> > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter > <lightguard...@gmail.com >> > >wrote: >> > >> Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via > osgi blueprint, >> > >> over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam > config >> > stuff, >> > >> we can certainly do that too. >> > >> — >> > >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com >> > >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > @Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not > straight >> > forward >> > >> > since some people will not want to bring any additional > lib for it >> > >> (because >> > >> > they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). > Wonder if >> > handling >> > >> > it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too. >> > >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >> > >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > >> > 2013/3/26 Gerhard Petracek > <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> @ romain: >> > >> >> imo it doesn't make sense to remove something > (and add it later on >> > >> again), >> > >> >> if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it > immediately). >> > >> >> anybody is welcome to work on DS-333. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> @ DS-288 >> > >> >> it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier > i'll finish it once >> > DS-289 >> > >> is >> > >> >> done. >> > >> >> (yes we need it for 0.4) >> > >> >> >> > >> >> @ xml-config >> > >> >> afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked > on it. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> regards, >> > >> >> gerhard >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> 2013/3/26 John D. Ament > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface > only for now >> makes >> > >> sense, >> > >> >> > we can enrich this further in another release. > How about we >> close >> > 113 >> > >> >> as a >> > >> >> > reduced scope and open a new issue for > remaining items? I see >> you >> > >> >> already >> > >> >> > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract > classes as a case as >> > >> well. >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we > need this in 0.4 or >> > can it >> > >> >> > wait? >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Romain, I didn't quite get you. Are you > saying you're on hold on >> > this >> > >> >> one >> > >> >> > (dependent on something?). >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in > 0.4? (DS-269 to >> > 272). >> > >> I'd >> > >> >> > prefer to move it. >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep > it since it's >> needed >> > >> for >> > >> >> > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will > not fix? >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we > need these? There >> are >> > >> other >> > >> >> > catch like issues out there. Are they needed? >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/ >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues > [1] >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > John >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789 >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain > Manni-Bucau >> > >> >> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > Hi >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to > another release and >> > keep >> > >> >> > > interface handling for this iteration > (well if you import asm >> > part >> > >> >> right >> > >> >> > > now it can work but then the question will > be which shade >> > version? a >> > >> >> > proxy >> > >> >> > > as in cxf?....) >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > other are not blocker IMO >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > >> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >> > >> >> > > *Blog: > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > >> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > >> >> > > *LinkedIn: > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > >> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek > <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > hi john, >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > @ examples: >> > >> >> > > > we haven't discussed what our > goal is here >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > @ DS-60 >> > >> >> > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and > release 0.5 >short< after >> 0.4) >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > @ DS-113 >> > >> >> > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and > move it to an own module >> > >> >> > > > (i'll create the module today) >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > @ DS-263 >> > >> >> > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 >> > >> >> > > > (you can have a look at the setup we > used in codi for it to >> > know >> > >> what >> > >> >> > you >> > >> >> > > > need) >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > @ DS-278 >> > >> >> > > > i re-opened it because we should find > a better approach imo. >> > >> >> > > > however, it isn't a real blocker >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > regards, >> > >> >> > > > gerhard >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > > All, >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, > I wanted to help get things >> > >> started >> > >> >> > to >> > >> >> > > > move >> > >> >> > > > > towards a 0.4 release. I > created the filter at [1] to show >> > our >> > >> >> > current >> > >> >> > > > > progress. >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > We currently have 50 issues > fixed in 0.4, with 27 >> unresolved >> > for >> > >> >> the >> > >> >> > > > > release. Some of these issues > stick out, with me thinking >> > that >> > >> >> we've >> > >> >> > > > > actually completed them but > perhaps need some finalization >> > >> (note: >> > >> >> > I'll >> > >> >> > > > use >> > >> >> > > > > the abbreviation DS for the > DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is >> > >> TL;DR) >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we > need more? >> > >> >> > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have > started integrating CDI Query. >> > Should >> > >> >> this >> > >> >> > > > have >> > >> >> > > > > spawned child tasks? >> > >> >> > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns > on this one and apparently >> > it >> > >> >> works >> > >> >> > > just >> > >> >> > > > > like the Seam3 version. Can > this be closed? >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > Some low hanging fruit: >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking > for something like this as >> > well. >> > >> >> > I've >> > >> >> > > > been >> > >> >> > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot > and think having a binary >> > >> release >> > >> >> > > would >> > >> >> > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. > If this isn't complete, do >> we >> > >> need >> > >> >> it >> > >> >> > > in >> > >> >> > > > > 0.4? >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy > enough to add. >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another > needed feature, but wasn't too >> > >> >> difficult >> > >> >> > in >> > >> >> > > > > either CODI or Seam3. >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one > isn't even scheduled for 0.4 >> > but >> > >> is a >> > >> >> > > > blocker >> > >> >> > > > > for the release. I'll > update it as such. >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > If you have something in the > list below that shouldn't be >> > (e.g. >> > >> >> it's >> > >> >> > > not >> > >> >> > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it > rescheduled. Since >> > previously >> > >> >> only >> > >> >> > > 289 >> > >> >> > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we > should be looking at >> > everything >> > >> >> else. >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > John >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > [1]: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >
