yup please later than 0.4. I'd say we call a feature freeze until we ship 0.4 (hopefully next week) and focus on
* JSF * JPA * Security After that we can add new features to the master branch. Of course, everyone is free to just add a feature branch for a new feature which is outside those areas. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:28 PM > Subject: Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release > >T he last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I figured it > wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly add it in > post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it. > — > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Jason, >> Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to DeltaSpike, even >> though it was already voted in? >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter > <lightguard...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via osgi > blueprint, >>> over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam config > stuff, >>> we can certainly do that too. >>> — >>> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> > @Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not straight > forward >>> > since some people will not want to bring any additional lib for it >>> (because >>> > they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). Wonder if > handling >>> > it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too. >>> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > 2013/3/26 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >>> >> @ romain: >>> >> imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it > later on >>> again), >>> >> if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately). >>> >> anybody is welcome to work on DS-333. >>> >> >>> >> @ DS-288 >>> >> it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll > finish it once DS-289 >>> is >>> >> done. >>> >> (yes we need it for 0.4) >>> >> >>> >> @ xml-config >>> >> afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked on it. >>> >> >>> >> regards, >>> >> gerhard >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 2013/3/26 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> >> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for > now makes >>> sense, >>> >> > we can enrich this further in another release. How about > we close 113 >>> >> as a >>> >> > reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items? > I see you >>> >> already >>> >> > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a > case as >>> well. >>> >> > >>> >> > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in > 0.4 or can it >>> >> > wait? >>> >> > >>> >> > Romain, I didn't quite get you. Are you saying > you're on hold on this >>> >> one >>> >> > (dependent on something?). >>> >> > >>> >> > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? > (DS-269 to 272). >>> I'd >>> >> > prefer to move it. >>> >> > >>> >> > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since > it's needed >>> for >>> >> > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix? >>> >> > >>> >> > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these? > There are >>> other >>> >> > catch like issues out there. Are they needed? >>> >> > >>> >> > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/ >>> >> > >>> >> > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1] >>> >> > >>> >> > John >>> >> > >>> >> > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> >> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > > Hi >>> >> > > >>> >> > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it >>> >> > > >>> >> > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another > release and keep >>> >> > > interface handling for this iteration (well if you > import asm part >>> >> right >>> >> > > now it can work but then the question will be which > shade version? a >>> >> > proxy >>> >> > > as in cxf?....) >>> >> > > >>> >> > > other are not blocker IMO >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>> >> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> >> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek > <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > hi john, >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > @ examples: >>> >> > > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > @ DS-60 >>> >> > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >> short< after 0.4) >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > @ DS-113 >>> >> > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to > an own module >>> >> > > > (i'll create the module today) >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > @ DS-263 >>> >> > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 >>> >> > > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in > codi for it to know >>> what >>> >> > you >>> >> > > > need) >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > @ DS-278 >>> >> > > > i re-opened it because we should find a better > approach imo. >>> >> > > > however, it isn't a real blocker >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > regards, >>> >> > > > gerhard >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > All, >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted > to help get things >>> started >>> >> > to >>> >> > > > move >>> >> > > > > towards a 0.4 release. I created the > filter at [1] to show our >>> >> > current >>> >> > > > > progress. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, > with 27 unresolved for >>> >> the >>> >> > > > > release. Some of these issues stick out, > with me thinking that >>> >> we've >>> >> > > > > actually completed them but perhaps need > some finalization >>> (note: >>> >> > I'll >>> >> > > > use >>> >> > > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key > in JIRA which is >>> TL;DR) >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we need more? >>> >> > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started > integrating CDI Query. Should >>> >> this >>> >> > > > have >>> >> > > > > spawned child tasks? >>> >> > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this > one and apparently it >>> >> works >>> >> > > just >>> >> > > > > like the Seam3 version. Can this be > closed? >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Some low hanging fruit: >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for > something like this as well. >>> >> > I've >>> >> > > > been >>> >> > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think > having a binary >>> release >>> >> > > would >>> >> > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. If this > isn't complete, do we >>> need >>> >> it >>> >> > > in >>> >> > > > > 0.4? >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to > add. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed > feature, but wasn't too >>> >> difficult >>> >> > in >>> >> > > > > either CODI or Seam3. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't > even scheduled for 0.4 but >>> is a >>> >> > > > blocker >>> >> > > > > for the release. I'll update it as > such. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > If you have something in the list below > that shouldn't be (e.g. >>> >> it's >>> >> > > not >>> >> > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it > rescheduled. Since previously >>> >> only >>> >> > > 289 >>> >> > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be > looking at everything >>> >> else. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > John >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > [1]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >
