Ok. How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of those are needed for 0.4?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>wrote: > The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I figured > it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly add it in > post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it. > — > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Jason, > > Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to DeltaSpike, even > > though it was already voted in? > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >> Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via osgi blueprint, > >> over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam config > stuff, > >> we can certainly do that too. > >> — > >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > @Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not straight > forward > >> > since some people will not want to bring any additional lib for it > >> (because > >> > they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). Wonder if > handling > >> > it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too. > >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >> > 2013/3/26 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >> >> @ romain: > >> >> imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it later on > >> again), > >> >> if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately). > >> >> anybody is welcome to work on DS-333. > >> >> > >> >> @ DS-288 > >> >> it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll finish it once > DS-289 > >> is > >> >> done. > >> >> (yes we need it for 0.4) > >> >> > >> >> @ xml-config > >> >> afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked on it. > >> >> > >> >> regards, > >> >> gerhard > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2013/3/26 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > >> >> > >> >> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for now makes > >> sense, > >> >> > we can enrich this further in another release. How about we close > 113 > >> >> as a > >> >> > reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items? I see you > >> >> already > >> >> > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a case as > >> well. > >> >> > > >> >> > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in 0.4 or > can it > >> >> > wait? > >> >> > > >> >> > Romain, I didn't quite get you. Are you saying you're on hold on > this > >> >> one > >> >> > (dependent on something?). > >> >> > > >> >> > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? (DS-269 to > 272). > >> I'd > >> >> > prefer to move it. > >> >> > > >> >> > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since it's needed > >> for > >> >> > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix? > >> >> > > >> >> > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these? There are > >> other > >> >> > catch like issues out there. Are they needed? > >> >> > > >> >> > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/ > >> >> > > >> >> > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1] > >> >> > > >> >> > John > >> >> > > >> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789 > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >> >> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Hi > >> >> > > > >> >> > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it > >> >> > > > >> >> > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and > keep > >> >> > > interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm > part > >> >> right > >> >> > > now it can work but then the question will be which shade > version? a > >> >> > proxy > >> >> > > as in cxf?....) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > other are not blocker IMO > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >> >> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >> >> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > hi john, > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > @ examples: > >> >> > > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-60 > >> >> > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after 0.4) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-113 > >> >> > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module > >> >> > > > (i'll create the module today) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-263 > >> >> > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 > >> >> > > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to > know > >> what > >> >> > you > >> >> > > > need) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-278 > >> >> > > > i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo. > >> >> > > > however, it isn't a real blocker > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > regards, > >> >> > > > gerhard > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > All, > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things > >> started > >> >> > to > >> >> > > > move > >> >> > > > > towards a 0.4 release. I created the filter at [1] to show > our > >> >> > current > >> >> > > > > progress. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved > for > >> >> the > >> >> > > > > release. Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking > that > >> >> we've > >> >> > > > > actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization > >> (note: > >> >> > I'll > >> >> > > > use > >> >> > > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is > >> TL;DR) > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we need more? > >> >> > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query. > Should > >> >> this > >> >> > > > have > >> >> > > > > spawned child tasks? > >> >> > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently > it > >> >> works > >> >> > > just > >> >> > > > > like the Seam3 version. Can this be closed? > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Some low hanging fruit: > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as > well. > >> >> > I've > >> >> > > > been > >> >> > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary > >> release > >> >> > > would > >> >> > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. If this isn't complete, do we > >> need > >> >> it > >> >> > > in > >> >> > > > > 0.4? > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too > >> >> difficult > >> >> > in > >> >> > > > > either CODI or Seam3. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 > but > >> is a > >> >> > > > blocker > >> >> > > > > for the release. I'll update it as such. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be > (e.g. > >> >> it's > >> >> > > not > >> >> > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled. Since > previously > >> >> only > >> >> > > 289 > >> >> > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at > everything > >> >> else. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > John > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >
