On Aug 31, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Exactly. For instance, IBM recently translated the new messages in 10.1, and I am looking at having these translation contributed back to Derby. It shouldn't be a problem this time around, because there haven't been any changes to the translated messages by others. In the future, though, there is a question of how not to stomp on somebody else's contribution if they provide a bug fix with translated messages, or a full set of translated messages. Whose translation is correct? How would one arbitrate the decision of who's message actually goes in? andrew |
- Re: Message translation question Andrew McIntyre
- Re: Message translation question Rick Hillegas
- Re: Message translation question Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: Message translation question Rick Hillegas
- Re: Message translation question David W. Van Couvering
- Re: Message translation question Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: Message translation question Andrew McIntyre
- Re: Message translation question Francois Orsini
- Re: Message translation quest... Andrew McIntyre
- Re: Message translation q... Daniel John Debrunner
